The UFO ETH can't be in this way it isn't

discovery channel documentary 2015 Last FALLBACK OBJECTION: The UFO ETH can't be in this way it isn't; okay it may be however despite everything it isn't; don't trouble me with truths, my brain is made up; and in any occasion it's all pseudoscience and I simply manage genuine science. Trust me on this - I'm a researcher!

Last ANSWER: Once upon a period Galileo Galilei and Nicolaus Copernicus would have been viewed as pseudo-cosmologists; Heinrich Schliemann (of Troy distinction) somebody who fiddled with pseudo-prehistoric studies; Charles Darwin was a pseudo-naturalist; and Alfred Wegener, clearly set forth a hypothesis (mainland float) that must be portrayed as pseudo-geography at the time. Indeed, even initially Albert Einstein was so far beyond the world of reasonable thinkers that his investigative seniors and bosses could undoubtedly have portrayed his material science as pseudo-physical science. Just time and history will be the judge regardless of whether the UFO ETH is or was pseudoscience or genuine science. The jury IMHO is still out on that issue.